![]() ![]() It'd be a great advantage if the web UIs allowed for synchronisation of config which would make managing multiple instances substantially easier and encourage more secure measures. ![]() Right now thats possible no doubt, but any whitelist, blacklist etc etc will need to be manually applied to two servers. Ideally rather than the other DNS server being a public one, it could be another Adguard instances so irrespective of what server is used, the traffic is protected. ![]() Either the router will have one DNS server configured which is expected to go down occasionally, or theres multiple and traffic 24/7 will be going to both. There's various reasons to want to want to run multiple instances, with the main one being people simply may need to reboot a system from time to time. Even if one was used more frequently than another, that leaves a percentage of requests going to a different DNS server and if thats not an Adguard server the security measures provided by this product are null and void for those requests. Generally if multiple DNS servers are configured, they will both be used. Routers don't strictly have a primary and secondary DNS in the sense that ones a backup only server, it's just poor terminology that gets used around the place and whether a router favours one DNS server over another is up to implementation and vendor. Think this should be reopened and made a feature request. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |